Since 2009, Danish hospitals have been covered by an accreditation programme, the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme (DDKM), which was introduced to improve quality and patient pathways. Accreditation programmes have been used internationally for decades. Nevertheless, until now there has been sparse documentation for any differences in quality of care or patient outcome s according to whether patients are treated at hospitals which fully meet the requirements of the accreditation standards or not. However, a new study including more than 276,000 patients who had been admitted to Danish hospitals has now for the first time examined this question and found an association:

"Our study shows that the mortality rate was lower among patients admitted to the hospitals that fully met the requirements in the Danish Healthcare Quality Programme (DDKM), compared with the hospitals that only partially met the requirements. We are talking about significant results that are relevant for how the hospitals organise the efforts to improve the level of quality and patient safety in future," says PhD student Anne Mette Falstie-Jensen from the Department of Clinical Epidemiology at Aarhus University and Aarhus University Hospital, and the Centre for Quality in the Region of Southern Denmark, which are jointly behind the study.

The study was recently published in the recognised scientific journal International Journal of Quality in Health Care.

Unique study

Using the Danish National Patient Register, the researchers followed a total of 276,980 Danes who were admitted to a public hospital between 2009-2012. The patients were classified according to whether they had been admitted to a hospital that fully met the requirements of the first version of the DDKM, or whether they were admitted to a hospital that only partially met the requirements. The researchers subsequently looked at the differences in 30 day mortality after hospitalisation -- and it is here that the hospitals that fully met the accreditation requirements do best:

"We can see both when we look at the accreditation system as a whole and when we only look at parts of it that there is an association between a high-level of compliance with the requirements and lower 30 day mortality.

Specifically, we can see that the mortality rate was lower in hospitals that fully met requirements for handling patients whose condition deteriorates or for treating cardiac arrest, to take a couple of examples," says Anne Mette Falstie-Jensen.

The scope of the study and its use of data from unique Danish registers has stirred international attention.

Better treatment through systematic quality improvement

The results are important for planning the healthcare system of the future:

"The study shows that how good the hospital is to effectively implement a quality improvement system probably has a significant impact. An important next step could be to try to identify the quality requirements which have the greatest impact on mortality, as a lean and focused but still effective approach is preferred when working with quality of care improvement," says Anne Mette Falstie-Jensen.

Story Source:

The above post is reprinted from materials provided by Aarhus University. The original item was written by Lotte Fisker Jørgensen. Note: Materials may be edited for content and length.